Question: Which do you think is worse, a woman who purposely commits paternity fraud in order to receive child support….?

(Posted by: GETitGIRL --------- on 2010-07-06 10:33:25)

From a man she knows can provide for her child or a woman who tries to get herself pregnant solely to have a child and not for monetary gain? So again, in the first instance she accidentally gets pregnant and decides afterwards to name the wrong man for money and in the second, her main objective is to have a child and she is not seeking child support. Which is worse? Inspired by Ello. Btw, I understand they’re both super deceptive but which do you think is worse?

Posted by: Disgruntled Y/A user on 2010-07-06, 10:37:28

Hands down one who does it just for the cash. Even though being deceitful is the wrong way to go about getting pregnant at least in that case she actually wants the baby and cares for it and isn't just in it for the money.

Posted by: Ming Ming on 2010-07-06, 10:36:00

These women must be black.

Posted by: Ouch on 2010-07-06, 10:37:32

Of coarse the one seeking monetary gain is worse. She may not even be a good mother to the child being that its just a meal ticket for her. In the other case although deceptive is not as malicious IMO and she will definately at least be a good mother because her sole purpose was to have a child for the sake of having one.

Posted by: Brain on 2010-07-06, 10:38:26

With DNA tests it is impossible to commit paternity fraud, so there goes that option. Second, I think having a child out of wedlock is wrong because tests prove that it is best for a child to have a 'family. " So, which is worse? I would rate them both the same, because both are selfish and will only end up in added stress, heartache and pain for the woman, the child and the father.

Posted by: Mindy mickevich on 2010-07-06, 10:38:45

I think it is wrong. The child has to suffer for the women and man mistake.

Posted by: I'm just a girl on 2010-07-06, 10:41:24

Women who purposely commits paternity fraud. I think that can just mess up a person's life. As for the woman that can get pregnant on purpose that may emotionally harm a person, or emotionally harm the child, because they might want a father, but I think that the fraud thing is worse, because that can really screw up someones life, and mess with their money, and put them through unnecessary circumstances.

Posted by: Carter ♥ on 2010-07-06, 10:41:49

A cracka on the streets, everytime i see a white ''person'' i want to f & &king die, ''they'' are all hideous and f & & &King sh &t faced pieces of sh &t .BLEUGH

Posted by: "Lil*RED" on 2010-07-06, 10:52:58

Maybe the one out for the money? idk @carter...i hate RACIST ppl every time i see one i just want THEM and their whole phucking family to die Wow and white ppl have the rep for being racist!!

Posted by: TS on 2010-07-06, 10:53:22

This is tougher than I thought. In regards to the child's welfare the 2nd one is worse (if she's not financially ready to bring a child into this world). She is clearly more a selfish person. But overall the 1st one is worse because her actions are directly bringing harm to an innocent. (the unaware male)

Posted by: KRS on 2010-07-06, 14:53:16

The one out for the money of course. The second one only wants a baby...right? You don't specify that she tricks the man into impregnating her to have the baby or not but either way the first one is worse. The one who lied about it just for cash is a monster and I would punch that bytch right in her face. I wouldn't never hit a woman but I'll kick a bytches azz!

Posted by: George McCasland on 2010-07-06, 18:20:13

The second as 85% of crime is committed by those raised fatherless. Http:/ / Children_Of_Separated_Parents.Dads-House.Org However, the first can collect for up to 18 years, than tell the man the child's not his, not be required to pay any of it back, and file a retroactive case on the bio dad for the same 18 years, depending on the state. So she can double dip. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\